Connect With Me
×

Please contact your Firm's Group Admin


IAR CE is only available if your organization contracts with Kitces.com for the credit.
Please contact your firm's group administrator to enable this feature.
If you do not know who your group administrator is you may contact [email protected]

2025澳洲幸运5正规官网开奖 -开奖官网查询澳洲结果历史168开奖记录-幸运澳洲五查询2025结果澳洲记录历史查询-历史开奖号码 澳洲的幸运5官方澳洲幸运开奖结果 查询记录,,幸运八开奖记录官网查询,澳洲幸运官网开奖视频 澳洲幸运5官网开奖记录168 Financial planning knowledge to help you better serve your clients.

Practice management ideas you can implement yourself.

65,253 financial advicers stay up to date with the latest from the Nerd's Eye View.

Join Your Fellow Advicers And See What We’re Talking About Close

Four Questions To Discover ‘Actual’ Risk Tolerance Differences In Couples

Measuring a client's risk tolerance is both an art and a science. Beyond assessing how a client feels in the moment, advisors must evaluate a client's long-term behavioral tendencies, actual risk capacity, and financial goals – all of which require considerable time and skill. These dynamic complexities multiply when working with couples, where each partner has unique preferences and traits and may influence the other's risk-taking behaviors.

Risk tolerance questionnaires alone often fail to capture the full picture of a couple's risk dynamics. While each partner may have distinct preferences and traits, their financial decisions are rarely made in isolation. For example, one person may be highly risk-averse, which can pressure the other to take on more risk to compensate for their partner's behavior. Furthermore, household dynamics often lead one partner to take on the role of "Family Financial Officer", who drives most of the financial decisions while the other partner remains less involved. Yet, even if one partner isn't actively managing finances, they are still affected by saving and spending decisions. And, if they feel overlooked – especially in early stages of working with an advisor – it can increase the likelihood of disengagement.

However, risk tolerance assessments can serve as a valuable tool for building goodwill with both partners – and setting the stage for long-term financial harmony. As a starting point, individual psychometric risk assessments can help identify two key considerations: whether there's a gap between a client's individual questionnaire score and their stated goals, and whether there are significant differences in risk tolerance between the two partners. From there, the advisor can guide clients in productively navigating these differences.

Advisors may want to ask what the client thought about the risk tolerance assessment, encouraging each partner to share their perspectives on financial risk, their past behavior with risk-taking, and their personal 'story' of risk, which can help the advisor better understand how each partner approaches financial decision-making. These conversations also offer an opportunity to discuss preferred communication styles about financial matters (especially in response to market performance). In the short term, focusing on shared priorities can promote alignment, while in the long term, honoring each partner's risk preferences can lead to more balanced financial decisions and a stronger sense of partnership in managing their wealth.

Ultimately, the key point is that a couple's risk tolerance is shaped by a combination of personal history, future concerns, and the ways that partners influence each other. Navigating differences in risk isn't a one-time evaluation but an ongoing conversation. And by proactively addressing these dynamics, advisors can help couples build confidence in their financial decisions and create a strong foundation for collaboration over time!

Read More...

#FASuccess Ep 429: What It Takes To Really Help (HNW) Business Owners Navigate Their Wealth With Purpose, With Ali Nasser

Ali Nasser Podcast Featured Image FAS

Ali Nasser Podcast Featured Image FASWelcome everyone! Welcome to the 429th episode of the Financial Advisor Success Podcast!

My guest on today's podcast is Ali Nasser. Ali is the Founder of the Wealth Integration System for Entrepreneurs, an education and coaching company based in Houston, Texas, that works with entrepreneurs facing a liquidity event and trying to figure out what's next… and financial advisors who serve them.

What's unique about Ali, though, is the path of how he built an advisory business by helping (high-net-worth) business owners achieve their financial goals while being true to their entrepreneurial mindset and drive (which can sometimes conflict with ‘standard' financial planning advice), which was so successful that he eventually sold his advisory firm so he could focus in even more deeply with non-advisory coaching and consulting services to entrepreneurs.

In this episode, we talk in-depth about how Ali attracted high-net-worth business-owner clients to his advisory firm by identifying planning gaps created by the client's current investment, tax, and estate advisors who might not have been coordinating their advice on the full breadth of the business owner's tax situation (on issues such as making charitable donations in the most tax-efficient way possible), how doing so helped Ali convince busy business owner prospects to go through a multi-meeting pre-engagement process to further demonstrate the value he provided (and helped both sides understand whether they would be a good client-advisor fit), and Ali's financial planning process itself (which could include eight meetings over the course of six to nine months) for mapping a path to what he calls "independent wealth" for his entrepreneur clients (as a way to facilitate them finding a better balance between their work and personal lives).

We also talk about how Ali approaches the delicate issue of concentration risk when working with entrepreneurs (who often have a deep emotional attachment to their business and might be hesitant to pull money out of it, despite it making up a very disproportionately large percentage of their net worth), how Ali helps business-owner clients overcome the "paradigm gap" of reluctance to invest in the broader stock market (preferring to continue reinvesting in their business instead) by framing index investing as a way to tap into the best entrepreneurial minds in the country but in a diversified and hands-off manner, and how Ali finds that (despite their sometimes very significant wealth), many business-owner clients still have to overcome feelings of financial scarcity (given how many high-net-worth entrepreneurs come from very financially difficult backgrounds).

And be certain to listen to the end, where Ali shares how, as an advisory firm owner, he sought out feedback not just from "squeaky wheel" clients but the ones who best represented the target avatar of client he wanted to serve (to better understand how to find and serve those clients he wanted to replicate), how Ali found that the hardest parts of being an entrepreneur himself were getting other team members on board with delivering the same level of experience that he as the founder wanted to provide to clients (and the subsequent challenge of letting employees go when they aren't a good fit to deliver up to those standards), and how Ali's own entrepreneurial journey led him to sell his advisory firm and focus full-time on coaching business-owners and the advisors working with them because, as he puts it, "the gems are in the details" of the process needed to really serve entrepreneur clients and their needs effectively.

So, whether you're interested in learning about attracting high-net-worth business-owner clients, how to handle the topic of concentration risk with entrepreneur clients, or strategies for receiving valuable and actionable client feedback, then we hope you enjoy this episode of the Financial Advisor Success podcast, with Ali Nasser.

Read More...

AI Meeting 澳洲幸运5开奖官网结果记录查询 澳洲幸运5历史查询 幸运澳洲彩开奖结果直播 澳洲幸运5开奖官网直播计划2024,开奖结果号码查询 开奖结果开奖记录历史, 澳洲幸运5官网开奖历史网站 Notes Tools For Financial Advisors: Solo Productivity Vs Associate Advisor Development?

With each passing decade, not only does technology evolve at an ever more dramatic pace, but each new wave comes faster than the last. From the advent of the computer chip in the 1950s to the rise of the personal computer nearly 25 years later in the early 1980s, to the emergence of the internet just 15 years thereafter in the late 1990s, to mobile smartphones only 10 years after that in the late 2000s, to 'robos' less than a decade later in the 2010s, and most recently to AI, which 'suddenly' went mainstream in late 2022 when ChatGPT burst onto the scene – the pace of technological change seems to be accelerating inexorably. And with the advent of AI in particular, questions have emerged about whether technology will replace many human jobs, including financial advisors.

Yet now, two years later, AI has not driven a mass wave of unemployment. Instead, it's being allocated to far more specific – but still very relevant and helpful – use cases that don't replace professional service providers and instead simply leverage their time to be even more efficient. In the case of financial advisors in particular, this has included everything from using ChatGPT as a brainstorming buddy for developing an advisor marketing plan, to generating a first draft of a client newsletter (as it's far easier to edit something already there than to write on a blank slate), to adopting what has quickly become the hottest AI-driven solution in advisor technology: AI Notetakers to support the client meeting.

In practice, rapid adoption of AI Notetakers has been expedited both by the media's fixation on Artificial Intelligence (which has highlighted a wide range of AI solutions like Fathom, Fireflies, and Otter) and by the rollout of AI Notetakers within existing platforms (from Microsoft's CoPilot to Zoom's AI Companion). But when it comes to financial advisors, our own Kitces Research on Advisor Productivity shows that while some of the "generic" solutions have gained market share the fastest, it turns out that the industry-specific solutions like Jump and Zocks lead in advisor satisfaction (while ironically, #1-adopted Zoom AI Companion actually ranks the lowest!). This is largely because, for financial advisors, it's not 'just' about capturing notes from the client meeting itself, but also about managing everything that follows: recording meeting notes in the CRM for compliance purposes, assigning post-meeting tasks to the team, and sending the client a post-meeting recap email. For which industry-specific providers are building the entire advisor-CRM-integrated workflow.

Yet the irony is that for many advisors, saving time on client meeting notetaking is difficult when those tasks have already been delegated – to the team's Associate Advisor. In fact, as our Kitces Research data shows, adoption of AI Meeting Notes tools has been most common amongst "pure solo" advisors, who have no one to delegate to (and instead find great leverage in delegating to an AI Notetaker). Nonetheless, AI Notetakers are not just for solo advisors; instead, they're also increasingly popular amongst larger (e.g., four to five person) teams, where it's easier to share out the AI's post-meeting notes to get everyone on the team (who may not have been in the meeting) up to speed. In addition, AI Notetakers are increasingly popular as advisors' financial plans get increasingly comprehensive; not surprisingly, the more detailed financial planning conversations happen in client meetings, the more there is to capture and share out.

At the same time, AI Meeting Notes tools themselves continue to evolve rapidly. What wasn't even a category of software just two years ago has now raised tens of millions of dollars in just the AdvisorTech domain alone, for what is not only nominally "notetaking" software, but increasingly covering the entire client meeting lifecycle (meeting notes → record notes in CRM → queue up post-meeting tasks → draft post-meeting recap email →→→ pre-meeting agenda for the next client meeting), and then leveraging the cumulative data to provide even more recall details for advisors about what happened in prior meetings.

In the long run, it seems clear that AI Meeting Notes tools are here to stay. In fact, with their increasingly comprehensive coverage of the entire client relationship, perhaps the biggest question is simply whether they'll remain standalone tools or, instead, if CRM systems for financial advisors will eventually offer their own built-in versions (since that's where the rest of the data about client relationships already resides!?).

Either way, the landscape of AI in advisor technology continues to evolve fast. And we're committed to keeping track of it with our Kitces Research. Which is why we're also launching our latest Kitces AdvisorTech survey, to collect data on the latest in how advisors are actually using technology. So if you have a few minutes, please take our AdvisorTech survey linked at the end of this article!

Read More...

Weekend Reading For Financial Planners (March 15–16)

Weekend Reading 150x150 Final

Enjoy the current installment of "Weekend Reading For Financial Planners" – this week's edition kicks off with the news that Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce suggested in a recent interview that she would like to see the SEC give advisors more leeway to provide customized solutions to clients (rather than feeling required to take a regulator-prescribed "check-the-box" approach) and would like to ease the compliance burden on smaller investment advisers (perhaps expanding the SEC's definition of small firm in the process) to reduce the entry and operational barriers for these firms. Which, if implemented under the new administration, could provide relief for investment advisers, particularly smaller firms that already have to balance compliance with client service, marketing, and the other duties that go into running a firm.

Also in industry news this week:

  • A recent survey finds that while advisors are increasingly using passive investment vehicles, many are taking the time to look beneath the hood to examine the makeup of different indexes in order to choose the best option for their clients
  • A survey of advisors working at enterprise firms shows a significant increase in their adoption of artificial intelligence tools over the past year, with common use cases including predictive analytics, marketing, and summaries of meeting notes

From there, we have several articles on Social Security:

  • The Social Security Administration has reversed a policy enacted last year that limited overpayment 'clawbacks' to 10% of monthly benefits, which will have the effect of reducing the monthly payments of some Social Security recipients to $0 until the overpayment is recovered
  • How the relationship between income and longevity could play a role in policy efforts to raise the Full Retirement Age in order to help shore up the Social Security system
  • A white paper shows the impact (in dollar terms) for clients of various proposals to put Social Security on sustainable footing

We also have a number of articles on practice management:

  • As growth-driven (rather than retirement-driven) RIA M&A activity increases, deal terms and cultural fit (and not 'just' headline valuations) are becoming increasingly relevant
  • Why a "curated cultural competition" with limited suitors rather than an "auction" focused on price could better serve the interests of RIA buyers and sellers alike
  • How firms can approach unsolicited acquisition offers, from analyzing the different compensation elements being offered to assessing whether the buyer shares a similar approach to financial planning

We wrap up with three final articles, all about building better habits:

  • 12 ways to build better habits, from breaking big goals down into smaller chunks to sharpening the ability to say "no" to opportunities that might distract from the goal at hand
  • How "commitment strategies" can reduce the amount of willpower required to start and maintain new habits
  • How running "tiny experiments" can help individuals build better habits while viewing their progress from a more impartial perspective

Enjoy the 'light' reading!

Read More...

Using Section 351 Exchanges To Tax-Efficiently Reallocate Portfolios With Embedded Gains

Following the long run-up in the US equity markets since the bottom of the 2008–2009 financial crisis, many investors with taxable investment accounts have likely found themselves with high embedded gains in their portfolios. While the gains signal portfolio growth, they also create challenges for ongoing management. Because when it comes time to rebalance the portfolio to its asset allocation targets – or to reallocate the portfolio to a new strategy – any trades made to implement those changes can generate capital gains, resulting in tax consequences for the investor.

Once a portfolio becomes 'locked up', i.e., unable to be managed without triggering capital gains, investors' options become limited. Charitably inclined investors can donate appreciated securities and avoid gains on the sale. If they don't plan to use the portfolio funds in their lifetime, they could simply hold the assets for heirs to preserve the stepped-up basis. Otherwise, the investor would traditionally have had to accept that taxes would impose a drag on their portfolio performance going forward.

One relatively new strategy, the Section 351 exchange, allows some investors to reallocate assets without triggering capital gains tax. Section 351 allows for tax deferral when assets are transferred to a corporation in exchange for that corporation's stock, provided the transferor owns at least 80% of the corporation following the exchange. Although the concept of Section 351 exchanges has existed for over a century, it has only recently been applied to individual investment portfolios.

The strategy works by pooling the portfolios of multiple investors in a newly created ETF, with the investors receiving ETF shares in return for the assets that they contributed. If the exchange meets the requirements of Section 351, it is tax-deferred for investors. And once inside the ETF 'wrapper', assets can be reallocated with no tax impact for the investors via the tax-efficient ETF structure, which makes use of in-kind creation and redemption of shares. In effect, investors can effectively trade a locked up for an ETF that can be managed with little or no tax impact at all!

However, to meet the requirements for tax-deferred treatment under Section 351, each investor's portfolio must meet a diversification test, where no single asset can exceed 25% of the portfolio's value and the top five holdings cannot exceed 50% of the overall value. Additionally, certain assets, like mutual funds, alternative assets, and REITs, may not be eligible for exchange, although other ETFs generally are.

For financial advisors, Section 351 exchanges present a potential solution for clients with high embedded gains, such as those who through the use of tax-loss harvesting have lowered their portfolios' basis to the point where it's no longer possible to harvest any losses to offset the gains realized in reallocating the portfolio. Recently, several ETF sponsors have launched ETFs seeded in-kind by individual investors, creating a new channel for advisors who want to take advantage of Section 351 exchanges for clients. Some providers even offer services to help advisors launch their own ETFs seeded by their clients' funds.

While the options for Section 351 exchanges remain limited – and some advisors may not yet be comfortable recommending them due to their short track record – the strategy is still worth watching. If it gains traction, it could be a helpful tool for advisors to implement more tax-efficient investment strategies – while overcoming the inconvenient tax friction of implementing the strategy to begin with!

Read More...